Re: Sponsored upload: odil 0.8.0-1
Hi Julien,
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:32:15AM +0200, Julien Lamy wrote:
> > However, there are two things I'd like to point out:
> >
> > 1. I think libodil0-dev and libodil0-doc should be renamed to
> > libodil-dev and libodil-doc. While adding the soversion to
> > the library package libodil0 it is quite unusual to add a
> > version to the development package (and the according doc).
> > The rationale is that it might be necessary to install
> > different soversion libs that should not conflict each other
> > but you develop only against a single development package.
> > Since we are now adding a new package (python3-odil) and
> > the package has to pass new queue anyway it would be the
> > right moment to fix this.
> > If you do so please make sure you add according
> >
> > Provides: libodil0-dev
> > Replaces: libodil0-dev
> > Breaks: libodil0-dev
> >
> > to the libodil-dev package definition.
>
> What you describe makes a lot of sense: done in Git.
:-)
I added the change to d/changelog and pushed.
> > 2. Since we are in freeze I'd recommend uploading to
> > experimental instead of unstable. (See recent discussion
> > also here on this list.)
>
> Who am I to argue with free policy? :) If I'm not mistaken, migration
> from experimental to unstable is manual, and I'll have to ask for a new
> sponsored upload if I want this version to appear in unstable after the
> release of stretch?
That's correct. Another upload is needed.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: