[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

No rule to make target 'ITKCommon_LIB-NOTFOUND', needed by 'lib/libfwItkIO.so.0.1'



Hi everybody

I'm still working on the packaging of the new upstream release of FW4SPL.

Today, I get this errror : 
 
[ 55%] Building CXX object fwItkIO/CMakeFiles/fwItkIO.dir/src/inr2itk/itkInrImageIOFactory.cpp.o
cd /build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwItkIO && /usr/bin/c++   -DBOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_DEBUG_PYTHON -DBOOST_LINKING_PYTHON -DBOOST_NO_CXX11_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS -DBOOST_THREAD_DONT_PROVIDE_DEPRECATED_FEATURES_SINCE_V3_0_0 -DBOOST_THREAD_PROVIDES_FUTURE -DBOOST_THREAD_VERSION=2 -DFWITKIO_EXPORTS -DFWITKIO_VER=\"0-1\" -DITK_USE_REVIEW=ON -DQT_NO_KEYWORDS -DSPYLOG_LEVEL=2 -DWXUSINGDLL -D__WXGTK__ -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/io/fwItkIO/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwItkIO/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwComEd/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwComEd/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwCom/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwCom/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwCore/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwCore/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwThread/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwThread/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwData/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwData/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwCamp/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwCamp/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwMemory/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwMemory/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwTools/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwTools/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwMedData/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwMedData/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwRuntime/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwRuntime/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwServices/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwServices/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwActivities/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwActivities/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwMath/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwMath/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwDataCamp/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwDataCamp/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwDataIO/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwDataIO/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/core/fwJobs/include -I/build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwJobs/include -isystem /usr/include/ITK-4.8 -isystem /usr/include/gdcm-2.6 -isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu -isystem /usr/include/dcmtk/config -isystem /usr/include/dcmtk/dcmdata -isystem /usr/include/dcmtk/dcmimage -isystem /usr/include/dcmtk/dcmimgle -isystem /usr/include/dcmtk/dcmjpeg -isystem /usr/include/dcmtk/dcmjpls -isystem /usr/include/dcmtk/dcmnet -isystem /usr/include/dcmtk/dcmpstat -isystem /usr/include/dcmtk/dcmqrdb -isystem /usr/include/dcmtk/dcmsign -isystem /usr/include/dcmtk/dcmsr -isystem /usr/include/dcmtk/dcmtls -isystem /usr/include/dcmtk/ofstd -isystem /usr/include/dcmtk/oflog -isystem /usr/include/dcmtk -isystem /usr/include/hdf5/serial -isystem /usr/include/vxl -isystem /usr/include/vxl/core -isystem /usr/include/vxl/vcl  -g -O2 -fPIE -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fpermissive -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fpermissive  -Wall -Wextra -Wconversion -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-ignored-qualifiers -fvisibility=hidden --std=c++11 -fPIC   -o CMakeFiles/fwItkIO.dir/src/inr2itk/itkInrImageIOFactory.cpp.o -c /build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/SrcLib/io/fwItkIO/src/inr2itk/itkInrImageIOFactory.cpp
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'ITKCommon_LIB-NOTFOUND', needed by 'lib/libfwItkIO.so.0.1'.  Stop.

Does someone have any idea about it ?


Thank you for your help,

Best regards,


Corentin

Reply to: