Re: License of Support Vector Machine
- To: "G. P. S. Raghava" <raghava@imtech.res.in>
- Subject: Re: License of Support Vector Machine
- From: Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 21:29:06 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20160101202906.GR29669@an3as.eu>
- In-reply-to: <EA39B47F-0374-4192-AC17-D81796E08FAD@imtech.res.in>
- References: <20140202170300.GP12058@an3as.eu> <20151018062507.GB5406@an3as.eu> <3E2E24A1-E9F5-4088-93E3-7F746409604E@imtech.res.in> <5624459D.7050202@gmx.de> <20151019061345.GA20759@an3as.eu> <20151114193833.GA29223@an3as.eu> <20151211223718.GC13630@an3as.eu> <73A80F83-0560-46B1-B70C-3EEB4074B569@imtech.res.in> <20151229164334.GA30126@an3as.eu> <EA39B47F-0374-4192-AC17-D81796E08FAD@imtech.res.in>
Hi Raghava,
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 09:27:19PM +0530, G. P. S. Raghava wrote:
> Thanks for your email, I agree with you that SVM_light is not free. In order to address this issue, we have developed a perl and python script which read and implement our SVM models. Now there is no need to distribute SVM_light with GPSR as our script can implement SVM.
Is this part of the 1.0 release of gpsr? I simply tried to find out in
what place the files need to be installed and the install.pl script was
checking for svmlight. Could you point out a way to move the files in
the right location without using this install script that is bound to
fail without svmlight?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: