Re: New version of ncbi-blast+ available
Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> writes:
> If you ask me under this cricumstances I'd upload even with FTBFS at
> Hurd since the package needs to pass new if you remove the binary
> package blast2. While it resides in new the FTBFS can be solved and
> another upload can fix it.
My understanding is that going through NEW is necessary only when
*adding* binary packages; dropping the old -dbg packages certainly
didn't require it. As such, ncbi-blast+ might have to go through NEW
when it takes over blast2 (unless there's a special provision for
takeovers), but ncbi-tools6 should be fine.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?amu@monk.mit.edu
Reply to: