Hi Michael,
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 03:00:26PM +0200, Michael Crusoe wrote:
> This issue may not provide much value for effort. Upstream never responded
> to my request for clarification: https://github.com/amplab/snap/issues/57
I'd be more concerned about the fact that some commits are mentioning
1.0beta.22, 1.0beta.23 etc - so they might fail in tagging what they
consider a sensible test target anyway ...
However, do you think commit e00630039eb07979b960661cc328e7d0824d2fb0
in packaging git solves your concern?
Kind regards
Andreas.
> 2016-12-02 13:39 GMT+02:00 Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com>:
>
> > On 02/12/16 10:38, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Michael,
> >>
> >> when browsing throught the list of packages with no sensible uscan
> >> result in DMD[1] I stumbled upon snap-aligner. I commited a watch file
> >> that is able to detect and download the releases tagged by upstream.
> >> IMHO the latest version should be 1.0~beta.18 and not 0.18~1.0~beta.18.
> >>
> >> What do you think about this?
> >>
> >> Kind regards
> >>
> >> Andreas.
> >>
> >> [1] https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?email1=debian-med-packaging@ list
> >> s.alioth.debian.org&email2=&email3=&packages=&ignpackages= > Common Workflow Language project <http://www.commonwl.org/>&
> >> format=html#todo
> >>
> >>
> > I agree. The latest tag (v1.0beta.18) should be mangled to either
> > 1.0~beta.18 or 1.0~beta18.
> >
> > Ghis
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Michael R. Crusoe
> Community Engineer & Co-founder
> https://impactstory.org/u/0000-0002-2961-9670
> michael.crusoe@gmail.com
> +40 720 781 765 <+40%20720%20781%20765>
> +1 480 627 9108 <(480)%20627-9108>
--
http://fam-tille.de