Re: cwl - ok for me to document my progress on wiki.d.o?
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 09:27:40PM -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> > So it should be added not only to med-bio but also to med-imaging,
> > right?
>
> Shouldn't it rather be put into the Debian Science Tools task [1]
> together with snakemake, make, makepp, and other workflow management
> tools? It might make more sense to keep the
> biology/imaging/other-specialized tasks focused more on directly-related
> software.
science/tasks(master) $ git diff HEAD^
diff --git a/tasks/tools b/tasks/tools
index ab0464c..388cdee 100644
--- a/tasks/tools
+++ b/tasks/tools
@@ -18,3 +18,5 @@ Depends: xoscope
Suggests: libmemtailor-dev
Depends: python-h5py | python3-h5py
+
+Depends: snakemake, cwl
I do not see any reason to add quite generic tools like make & makepp.
However, despite the fact that I think these tools are well placed in
science-tools tasks are not exclusive. A task should give a hint to a
user looking at the task matching the own field of work. So there is no
point in putting snakemake and cwl into only science-tools. We could
decide that it is not that important for med-bio / med-imaging and just
use a "Suggests" relation.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: