Re: suitename_0.3.070628-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Michael,
could you please contact the authors to reconsider their license and
explain item 12.i of the dfsg-fay[1] to them? I just realise that
king-probe is affected by the same license. It would be great if you
could provide an e-mail address as Upstream-Contact.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 06:00:11PM +0000, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> unfortunately I have to reject your package.
>
> The term:
> "(2) any modified versions of the program are also available for free."
> of the license makes it incompatible with the DFSG [1].
>
> Thorsten
>
> [1] for example https://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html point 12.i
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> Debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: