Re: [ucko@debian.org: Bug#794729: libdivsufsort-dev: missing dependency on libdivsufsort3]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Am 22.08.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Tomasz Buchert:
> I've pushed another change to libdivsufsort which, to my knowledge,
> is "The Right Thing To Do". I still needed to apply a custom patch
> for "include" directory because header files are generated
> on-the-fly, but other than that it seems fine.
Patch looks ok to me, but I am not an expert on these things.
> I propose to ask upstream to use them.
Definitely, once we have the patches ready, they should be bundled in
a pull request. Then we should notify upstream via mail, because they
don't seem to be an active GitHub user.
With respect to bug #794729. I guess that is fixed now and can be
closed. But since libdivsufsort-dev now depends on libdivsufsort3
should we also add the 3 to the -dev package: libdivsufsort3-dev? What
is the usual debian way to handle that?
Best,
Fabian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=FZdA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: