Re: fastq status?

[Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>]

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:57:43AM +0200, olivier.sallou@codeless.fr wrote:
> > Debian Science team.  In other words:  While you stated that what we
> > need is probably a different code base than we need for fastqc the
> > package might need some love independently.
> I may package it independently but how should we do that ? It would in a
> way conflict with "official" hdf5 lib. How should we name /describe it ?
> Or should it be a kinda libjava-fastq-hdf5 package ?

I do not think that fastqc is the important point but may be 

    libjava-hdf5-ethz

since it was developed at ethz.  Does this sound logical?

Kind regards

          Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de