should google-glog be ok with libunwind7-dev? [Was: Orthanc 0.7.2 backport of wheezy]
Hi Daigo,
I have looked at the packporting of orthanc for Wheezy. orthanc uses
google-glog and that one currently build-depends on libunwind8-dev. It
seems to build (including the build-time testing -- thanks for enabling
those!) fine using libunwind7-dev, so I thought to check with you
- if you have any information that unwind7 in wheezy would be
insufficient/too buggy for google-glog?
- would you mind adjusting debian/control to Build-depend on
libunwind8-dev [i386 amd64] | libunwind7-dev [i386 amd64]
to ease its future backporting?
Thank you in advance
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
> Hi Andreas and Yaroslav,
> >>I was not able either to find a complete "backporting handbook" for
> >>Debian Med packages: Andreas, is there such a guide available
> >>somewhere?
> >I admit I'm quite lazy with backports and while I definitely think this
> >is a reasonable task I somehow consider it "Somebody Else's Problem".
> >I simply need to restrict my field of work.
> Yes, you are perfectly right.
> Yaroslav, I have just expanded the build instructions for Debian Wheezy [1].
> The only third-party package that should be backported to get an
> Orthanc package for Wheezy is libgoogle-glog-dev [2] (only available
> for Squeeze and Sid). I will not personally do this backporting
> task, but if someone does it, I could then backport Orthanc to
> Wheezy.
> Cheers,
> Sébastien-
> [1] http://goo.gl/t7XVqe
> [2] http://packages.debian.org/en/sid/libgoogle-glog-dev
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
Senior Research Associate, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
Reply to: