Re: Bug#728797: ITP: python-mne -- Python modules for MEG and EEG data analysis
ok - done, 0.7.1-2 went into neurodebian, wheezy users should become
happier ;) cheers
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014, Alexandre Gramfort wrote:
> all good for me.
> I'll let you know when we merge the PR with the py 2.6 fixes.
> I'll then backport and tag 0.7.2
> thanks
> Alex
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
> <debian@onerussian.com> wrote:
> > ok -- while "support 2.6" actions are cooking I thought it would be
> > worthwhile to reupload to NeuroDebian a build without 2.6.
> > Would there be objections if I push to git the following commit and upload
> > generated packages to NeuroDebian. Marked changelog as 'neurodebian' since
> > that is where it is intended to go and makes no sense for unstable i.e. proper
> > Debian upload
> > $> git show
> > commit e1d70152267aedf2ba7f4f5be167d53854d5b2c2
> > Author: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
> > Date: Sun Jan 12 10:03:16 2014 -0500
> > Boost X-Python-Version to >= 2.7 to provide installable builds for wheezy
> > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
> > index b23aa17..c7f2b36 100644
> > --- a/debian/changelog
> > +++ b/debian/changelog
> > @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> > +python-mne (0.7.1-2) neurodebian; urgency=low
> > +
> > + * Boost X-Python-Version to >= 2.7 to provide installable
> > + builds for wheezy
> > +
> > + -- Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com> Sun, 12 Jan 2014 10:02:56 -0500
> > +
> > python-mne (0.7.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > [ Alexandre Gramfort ]
> > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> > index b85808a..5ab70eb 100644
> > --- a/debian/control
> > +++ b/debian/control
> > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Standards-Version: 3.9.5
> > Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-med/python-mne.git
> > Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/python-mne.git
> > Homepage: http://martinos.org/mne
> > -X-Python-Version: >= 2.6
> > +X-Python-Version: >= 2.7
> > Package: python-mne
> > Architecture: all
> > On Sat, 11 Jan 2014, Alexandre Gramfort wrote:
> >> or may be you would prefer to adjust that one to stay 2.6 compatible?
> >> I guess that would be better as it should stay compatible with 2.6 ... �
> >> it's a mistake on our side... I'll setup a jenkins on 2.6 to avoid this
> >> issue
> >> in the future.
> >> �
> >> also for testing, I am usually trying to test with all supported
> >> versions, which could help point out other possible 2.7 dependencies.
> >> ATM you are testing only for current version... (in Debian sid it is 2.7
> >> only but in older ones ,multiple)
> >> ok -- let me cook up testing first, see if there is anything else TODO
> >> for 2,6 support, if not much then I would wait on your thoughts first
> >> thanks for your help
> >> Alex
> >> �
> > --
> > Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
> > http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
> > Senior Research Associate, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
> > Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
> > Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
> > WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
Senior Research Associate, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
Reply to: