[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Compiling binaries on package installation



Hi Yaroslav,

On 14-10-14 14:40, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, Michael Banck wrote:
> 
>>> Or should I point out how to "compile your own", like it is done in the
>>> "Building an optimized OpenBLAS packages on your architecture" in the
>>> README.Debian file of openblas-base?
> 
>> Not sure what's in those files, but I suggest to support
>> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=custom in your Debian packaging, which would build an
>> optimized package for a the user.  That's what the ATLAS package are
>> (were?) doing, and if we have enough packages like that, doing the m-a
>> like tool as mentioned above would be a matter of knowing which packages
>> do support it.
> 
> +1 BUT from a user perspective it would have been much more
> convenient if there was e.g. 'atlas-custom-installer' package which
> would do that automagically at the package installation time.  

I agree. That would be easiest for the user/sysadmin.

> With
> 'build yourself' approach necessary manual interaction is also inferior
> for delivering urgent functionality or security updates, since there
> would be no automatic update.
> 
> You might also look at matlab-support-dev package and its rdepends
> -- since Matlab is not distributable, with this package we help to
> automate building of the Matlab extensions at the installation time,
> using "registered" within matlab-support alternatives instance of
> user-installed Matlab.  So far seemed to work quite neat.

Thanks for the pointer. I'll have a look!


Lennart.

> 
> Cheers,
> 

-- 
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
L.C. Karssen
Utrecht
The Netherlands

lennart@karssen.org
http://blog.karssen.org
GPG key ID: A88F554A
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: