[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packing of Fw4spl



Hi Corentin,

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 02:30:56PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote:
> > After doing so I was running into a cmake issue:
> >
> > dh_auto_configure # See bug: 708131
> > -- The C compiler identification is GNU 4.9.1
> > -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 4.9.1
> > -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc
> > -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc -- works
> > -- Detecting C compiler ABI info
> > -- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done
> > -- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++
> > -- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++ -- works
> > -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info
> > -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done
> > CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:184 (MESSAGE):
> >   You cannot have a + in your binary path
> >
> > CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:187 (MESSAGE):
> >   You cannot have a + in your source path
> >
> > -- Performing Test VCL_HAS_BOOL
> > -- Performing Test VCL_HAS_BOOL - Success
> >
> > If you are interested in vxl it would be nice if you could try to track
> > this down.  My cmake experience is extremely limited and the line
> > numbers of any of the CMakeLists.txt files in the source do not look
> > suspicious to me.  I could easily help uploading a working package but I
> > do not want to spend my time in cmake issues as long there is no really
> > strong interest in this package.
> 
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> I have got the sources of vxl and the content of the Debian
> directory (on SVN)
> to apply patches. I've tried to reproduce the previous CMake issue but I've
> not succeed. Maybe are you using a different version of CMake ? I'm using
> cmake 2.8.12.1.

Well, current cmake in unstable (and testing) is 2.8.12.2-1.  You should
be able to build the package in a pbuilder chroot which should guarantee that
we are using the very same tools.  (If you have no idea how to set up this
feel free to ask for more details.

Kind regards

         Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: