Re: Orthanc 0.7.4

[Sebastien Jodogne <s.jodogne@chu.ulg.ac.be>]

Hi Andreas,

Sorry for the inconvenience, I thought that lintian was automatically 
run as a part of the build process, which is seemingly not the case anymore.

I have just fixed the errors and warnings [1].

Thanks,
Sébastien-


[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med?view=revision&revision=16834


On 04/28/2014 02:39 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:05:32PM +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest
> > upstream version of Orthanc (0.7.4) [1,2].
> >
> > Please would you kindly upload it to unstable? Thanks in advance!
>
> I checked the packaging and have noticed the following remaining
> lintian issues:
>
> E: orthanc source: source-is-missing debian/JS/DateJs/src/core.js
> E: orthanc source: source-is-missing debian/JS/DateJs/src/sugarpak.js
> E: orthanc source: source-is-missing debian/JS/DateJs/src/time.js
> W: orthanc source: ambiguous-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line 48
> W: orthanc source: missing-license-text-in-dep5-copyright mit (paragraph at line 48)
> W: liborthancclient-dev: spelling-error-in-changelog explicitely explicitly
> I: orthanc: spelling-error-in-binary usr/sbin/Orthanc supress suppress
> W: orthanc: spelling-error-in-changelog explicitely explicitly
> W: liborthancclient0.7: spelling-error-in-changelog explicitely explicitly
> I: liborthancclient0.7: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libOrthancClient.so.0.7
> W: liborthancclient-doc: spelling-error-in-changelog explicitely explicitly
> I: liborthancclient-doc: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration
>
>
> At least the "E:" tagged issues need to be resolved - if I'm not
> missleaded all can be simply deleted but I would like you to
> check this first.
>
> The other issues are also simple to fix with exception of
> no-symbols-control-file - I would recommend to ignore this because to my
> experience the symbols control files create more work for the maintainer
> than they have any use in those low dependency packages as we are
> dealing with.
>
> Kind regards
>
>         Andreas.