Hi Jim,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:40:56AM -0800, Jim Kent wrote:
> No problem about the users not necessarily respecting the license. We
> already have the source code up on the net with no protection. We rely on
> the honor system, and the business remains good enough at least to pay the
> mortgage.
:-)
> I think there may be a problem with your build. I've got a _little_ time
> to help you with this, but if I get too busy to answer all your email
> please don't take it personally.
I'm far away from taking this personally. Considering your past response
time I'm pretty sure that you might have more urgent things to do if we
need to wait a bit longer.
> Here's the output I get from the make
> test in our main source tree.
>
> blat -verbose=0 hCrea.geno hCrea.mrna testRna.psl
> ...
> diff intron50k/expected/test3.psl intron50k/out/test3.psl
>
> rm -rf intron50k/out
>
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/cluster/home/kent/kent/src/blat/test'
This looks like a perfect test result and we definitely need to reach
this state with the Debian package before this will be published. The
only vague idea I have is that some compiler options might lead to the
wrong result. I attached a build log for blat and I wonder whether you
might like to have a short look whether some of the options might look
suspiciouos to you. This could give some hint where to switch the lever
next time.
Thanks a lot for your kind cooperation
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Attachment:
blat_35-1_amd64.build.log.gz
Description: Binary data