Re: Bug#728797: ITP: python-mne -- Python modules for MEG and EEG data analysis
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi Yaroslav,
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >>>Hmmmm, this information is new to me. If I have understood NEW queue
> >>>correctly than it is better not to touch packages which are in the
> >>>queue. Otherwise you might confuse ftpmaster or influence the position
> >>>of your package to get handled later. Do you have any reference that
> >>>I#m wrong in assuming this?
> >>sorry -- I would not even try to look up the reference atm (need to work
> >>on turkey) but just trust me on this one -- IIRC position would not
> >>change and ftpmasters will be just fine.
> in case an ftp trainee has checked the -1 version and now sees a new
> one, he would not be delighted by this, as his previous work would
> be just a waste of time.
is that from personal experience?
debdiff between the two would quickly show what was changed/fixed thus
possibly addressing already enlisted concerns which trainee would need
to deal upon resubmission anyways, thus imho the situation would
be a win-win
mne is so early in the queue that it is doubtful anyone is looking at it
atm anyways
> >>look e.g. at debmake in http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html ;)
> This seems to be one of the oldest packages in the queue ...
and not the only one with multiple versions... so far your concern is
the first one I ever heard in regard of reuploads to NEW
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
Senior Research Associate, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
Reply to: