Re: FASTX-Toolkit on GitHub.
(incomplete sentence below ...)
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 10:30:04AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> [Alexandre, we might consider using plain Git clones as well, just to
> inform you about the discussion. It might make sense if you subscribe
> this list.]
>
> Hi Charles,
>
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 04:42:47PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Le Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 11:42:18AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> > >
> > > Would people object if I would simply create a debian branch of the upstream
> > > repositories from scratch and hence lose the commit history from the current
> > > source packages ?
>
> No objection against loosing history.
>
> > For the Debian branch, it was not that hard after all.
> >
> > The Debian package for fastx-toolkit is on GitHub for the moment:
> >
> > https://github.com/Debian/fastx-toolkit
> >
> > If nobody objects, I will replace the current fastx-toolkit repository on
> > Alioth by this one.
>
> Fine for me. In any case we should have a clone on Alioth.
>
> > Note that it does not contain the ‘pristine-tar’ and
> > ‘upstream’ branches, which are not particularly useful anymore.
>
> In any case you should add the needed workflow / tips how to deal
> with this
.... into our group policy.
> I somehow wonder in how far two different people should
> create an md5sum identical orig.tar. Seems with this workflow it
> is not possible without using `apt-get source`.
>
> > Currently, the package fails to build: changes upstream now let the hardening
> > flags be passed to the compiler, which triggers fatal errors. I reported the
> > issue at the following URL. I am sure that patches are very welcome.
> >
> > https://github.com/agordon/fastx_toolkit/issues/1
> >
> > I also opened a similar issue on libgtextutils.
> >
> > https://github.com/agordon/libgtextutils/issues/1
>
> I might give it a try if the repository is in alioth and I can commit.
> Seems not be to hard. Please, if you put advises into policy to let me
> know if I should do this as quilt patches or commit directly to the
> repository.
>
> I'm specifically interested because we might adopt this workflow for
> mne-python as well.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20131109093004.GB23347@an3as.eu">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20131109093004.GB23347@an3as.eu
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: