Re: LEG: Optimisation and porting - assembly
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 09:56:11AM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> Weeeeell, I suppose in many cases those contain asm for a
> reason - they do a LOT of number crunching and/or data
> munging.
The analysis was quite explicite about the reasons why assembly code was
used an in what cases it can be prevented. So there is no need to
suppose anything but simply to look into the attached table. BTW, after
a second look EMBOSS was a false positive I forgot to remove (sorry for
the noise to EMBOSS developers). I found some article in German language
that might be a reasonable summary of the study[1]
> I can be wrong.
Sure, everybody can. I guess in several cases you are according to the
table and in some you are not.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/19624/uebersicht-ueber-assemblercode-in-freier-software.html
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: