Re: Med-E-Tel 2013 Poster
- To: Eric Maeker <eric.maeker@gmail.com>
- Cc: freemedforms@googlegroups.com, "Christian A. Reiter" <christian.a.reiter@gmail.com>, Holger Schmuhl <holger.schmuhl@gmail.com>, freemedforms-asso@googlegroups.com, mmtplus@medicalistes.org, Gerialist@yahoogroupes.fr, Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>, opensuse-medical@opensuse.org, FedoraMedical <medical-sig@lists.fedorahosted.org>, GNUmed list <Gnumed-devel@gnu.org>, Thomas Karopka <tkaropka@googlemail.com>
- Subject: Re: Med-E-Tel 2013 Poster
- From: Nicolas Barbier <nicolas.barbier@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 09:58:18 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] CAP-rdTaXrMwWH23xk3uBdVb_fCf3av3Y2JhuGNh_BvSRkFtuvw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] F8F968D1-B021-44A5-8E53-B4EE72E6558F@gmail.com>
- References: <[🔎] 090EB3BF-6457-473B-8653-ABADF07A1BF8@gmail.com> <[🔎] F8F968D1-B021-44A5-8E53-B4EE72E6558F@gmail.com>
2013/3/16 Eric Maeker <eric.maeker@gmail.com>:
> http://ericmaeker.fr/FreeMedForms/medetel_2013.pdf
>
> Thanks for your review and comments.
“Actually, the DDI engine” → “Currently, the DDI engine”
<URL:http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/actually#Usage_notes>
“Some development is actually started” → “Some development is
currently underway” (or “has just been started” or so)
“during three different moments” → “at three different moments”
(because “during” indicates a period, while “moment” is instantaneous)
“to avoid competing conflicts”: What is a “competing conflict”?
Of less importance are:
“require a user validation to pass through.” → “require a user
validation to continue.” (because “to pass through” has a more
physical meaning in my mind)
“the DDI software of the project” → “the project’s DDI software” or
maybe “FreeMedForms’ prescription module”
Question: Does FreeMedForms use the same XML-based interface (as
GNUmed) to communicate with FreeDiams?
“implemented this interoperability.” → “implemented this interface.”
Great job of telling the important things in such a concise manner
(which I guess is the most important property of such a poster?).
Nicolas
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
Reply to: