Re: Flexbar source code?
Hi Johannes,
thanks again for your very helpful clarification. After reading this I
think it might be the best idea if we try to package flexbar as it is
(including seqan copy) for the experimental branch in Debian which helps
Toni for the moment and once there might be some new seqan library
release we will build flexbar using this new release and move it to main
Debian. I guess for the moment this helps those who need flexbar now
and is technically OK.
Toni, do you consider it reasonable if we do this together at the Debian
Med Sprint in Kiel?
Johannes, thanks again for sharing your insight and also for providing
flexbar as free software
Andreas.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:09:08PM +0100, Johannes Röhr wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> it is completely clear to me that one should use as many packaged libraries as possible. I'm simply not sure if it works with the older SeqAn package apart from modifications. I would have to test this first, and for reasons of consistency I would then go back to this release also on sourceforge. Since I know that a lot changes were introduced in the recent year, especially in the align module and the argument parser, this could cause problems and I also prefer to rely on the recent implementations.
>
> Therefore, I propose to wait for the next SeqAn package release. I will then use it also for the Flexbar version on sourceforge and will try to come along without modifications. Since I applied only very slight modifications, I am optimistic that it works out and I will discuss it with SeqAn developers. I definitely prefer to use an official and unmodified release, and see it as an aim for coming versions. Besides from cleaner sources and packaging, it would then also become obsolete to adjust new SeqAn libs to modifications for inclusion in Flexbar. However, I am not sure how fast a new packaged release will be provided.
>
> Best regards
> Johannes
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: