Re: Fwd: Re: [Debian-med-packaging] j2f package
Le 3/22/12 11:13 PM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 05:39:49PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>>>> Regarding different blas fortran code, should we try using it in place
>>>> of provided one in cvs ?
>>> I'd say whatever leads flawlessly to the final goal to get mtj.jar
>>> packaged. It might be of academical interest to base the build process
>>> on the maintained Debian packaged code, however, I'm afraid this might
>>> create a lot of extra work which is not rewarded by the final use case
>>> as the users of the original mtj.jar never cared about this.
>> I indeed think that may be quite difficult. Using source blast.j would
>> be easier
> As I said: We should choose the most straightforeward way to get mtj
> packaged.
>
>>>> 3) update build.xml to use netlib-java lib + f2j to generat mtj
>> How do you want to share the work ?
> Just tell me where you need help. I could set high priority onto this
> task because I would be really interested to finally get beast out.
> I'll adapt tou you wishes - just propose what might fit your workload.
>
>> Do you want I package jlapack and netlib-java ?
>> Build stuff should be easy, I have not care yet however at licensing etc...
> I'd volunteer to write debian/copyright files if this would help
> speeding up things. I could also dive into get-orig-source but I think
> this would be no big deal. Just tell me how I could help and I'll do
> so.
I will try to package those both, I will tell you if I have any issue
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
--
Olivier Sallou
IRISA / University of Rennes 1
Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE
Tel: 02.99.84.71.95
gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438
Reply to: