Status bibref gatherer (Was: Tasks pages (close to) fixed; Bibref does not seem to be updated automatically)
- To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Status bibref gatherer (Was: Tasks pages (close to) fixed; Bibref does not seem to be updated automatically)
- From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 21:03:16 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120308200316.GA3788@an3as.eu>
- In-reply-to: <20120223151953.GD15447@an3as.eu>
- References: <20120217221626.GB8823@an3as.eu> <20120218152517.GA28208@falafel.plessy.net> <20120218155340.GE20647@an3as.eu> <20120218184041.GI20647@an3as.eu> <20120223005555.GC17772@falafel.plessy.net> <20120223074500.GA8824@an3as.eu> <20120223085159.GA18124@falafel.plessy.net> <20120223091352.GE8824@an3as.eu> <20120223150437.GA20070@falafel.plessy.net> <20120223151953.GD15447@an3as.eu>
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:19:53PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> May be I'm doing some to strong simplification - I just wanted to save
> time and kept it short. But as I said we can work on the collecting
> upstream files completely independently from the task to import those
> files into UDD.
I just want to let you know that I wrote some code to parse upstream
files stored in the proposed directory layout and move references into a
UDD table featuring a "rank" column - so at least we can store more than
one reference. This does not answer the question how we finally use
this information but editors of debian/upstream files are free to add
more than one reference.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: