Re: Bug#689041: Re: Orthanc
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Sebastien Jodogne
<s.jodogne@chu.ulg.ac.be> wrote:
> Dear Gregor,
>
>
>>>> * why libcurl4-gnutls-dev | libcurl4-nss-dev | libcurl4-openssl-dev ?
>>>> shouldn't that be something simplier like libcurl4-dev ? libcurl-dev ?
>>>> libcurl-ssl-dev ?
>>>
>>>
>>> If I use "libcurl4-dev", "libcurl-dev" or "libcurl-ssl-dev", I
>>> obtain the following Lintian warning:
>>>
>>> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends.html
>>>
>>> For this reason, I have preferred to keep my explicit enumeration.
>>
>>
>> An alternative would be to use "libcurl4-gnutls-dev | libcurl4-dev".
>
>
> Thank for your reply! I have just uploaded another version of the package
> with your suggested improvement:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/orthanc/orthanc_0.2.2-3.dsc
Why did you choose gnutls ? Your code seems to be using the openssl
one. And your copyright is explicitely setup to deal with openssl
exception anyway ?
thx
--
Mathieu
Reply to: