On 07/15/2012 09:50 AM, Luis Ibanez
wrote:
[KSB] vista-addon-ewd might be a more appropriate name than vista-client-ewd. Remember that there can be multiple VistA environments on a single system. So, just as the VistA Debian package itself should not be directly runnable but should provide a means to install environments (like the SemiVivA packages), the EWD Debian package need not be directly runnable. Debian package ewd (or, if we don't like 3 character packaged names, perhaps something like mgateway-ewd) would depend on fis-gtm and install EWD on the system and vista-addon-ewd would depend on ewd and vista, and provide a tool (like a shell script) to add EWD to a selected VistA environment. -- Bhaskar
-- GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises.
_____________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. |