Re: Do we track releases or development versions [Was: r-bioc-cummerbund ... upstream/1.1.3-17-gae72ebb]
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Andreas Tille <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:32:11AM -0400, Carlos Borroto wrote:
>> I agree on following stable releases as a general rule. The reason I
>> chose to use development version of cummeRbund was because at the time
>> upstream was recommending it. The package was on heavy development and
>> stable releases tied to Bioconductor were getting behind quite fast. I
>> just checked the upstream website and now the recommendation is to use
>> the stable version tied to Bioconductor.
>> I just finish my semester yesterday and I plan to get up to speed with
>> several TODOs I have with the packages I'm contributing to.
> Thanks for the clarification.
>> I'll do this update right away.
> Just let us know if you need any help / sponsoring.
I'm taking a look at this package and everything seems ready. I see
you already fixed the watch file. Regarding citation, I haven't read
yet how we are doing this, but I will soon. Do you wan't me to get the
changelog ready and ask for sponsoring? Or do you have something else
in mind that should be tackle before submission?