Packaging of cd-hit for Debian
Hi Weizhong,
I intend to package cd-hit for Debian on behalf of the Debian Med team
as an extension for the qiime package. I hope you like this.
The packaging process went smoothly but there is one problem with the
user documentation in PDF format only (cdhit-user-guide.pdf): Our
ftpmasters are requesting the source of such documents (as for any
binary chunks in the package) and also the confirmation that the license
of the code es also valid for the documentation.
Could you provide something like this?
Kind regards
Andreas.
----- Forwarded message from Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> -----
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:00:01 +0100
From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Bug#652074: ITP: cd-hit -- suite of programs designed to quickly group sequences
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
* Package name : cd-hit
Version : 4.5.6
Upstream Author : Weizhong Li <liwz@sdsc.edu>
* URL : http://weizhong-lab.ucsd.edu/cd-hit/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C++, Perl
Description : suite of programs designed to quickly group sequences
cd-hit contains a number of programs designed to quickly group
sequences. cd-hit groups proteins into clusters that meet a user-defined
similarity threshold. cd-hit-est is similar to cd-hit, but designed to
group nucleotide sequences (without introns). cd-hit-est-2d is similar
to cd-hit-2d but designed to compare two nucleotide datasets. A number
of other related programs are also in this package. Please see the
cd-hit user manual, also part of this package, for further information.
The packaging is done in the Debian Med team and is available in Debian
Med SVN at
Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/cd-hit/trunk/
The only remaining issue is to clarify source + copyright of the included
PDF documentation.
This WNPP bug solves also bug #651983 - qiime: Recommends: not available
'cd-hit' package.
----- End forwarded message -----
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: