Re: Ginkgo-CADx segfaults
On Friday, November 11, 2011 09:42:23 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Sebastian Hilbert
>
> <sebastian.hilbert@gmx.net> wrote:
> > On Friday, November 11, 2011 01:55:51 AM Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:23:01AM +0100, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> >> > On Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:03:09 AM Steffen Möller wrote:
> >> > > Sorry for saying the obvious here, but if the bug is not
> >> > > Debian-specific, then it should go to ITK upstream.
> >>
> >> I definitely encourage that patches for upstream bugs be sent
> >> upstream.
> >>
> >> > The question was more along the lines if Debian packages accept
> >> > patches which upstream refuses (have not checked with upstream ITK
> >> > but have had issues with wxwidgets).
> >>
> >> It's common for Debian to have patches not in upstream. Often, in my
> >> experience, it's not because of upstream refusal but due to differing
> >> priority or differing release cycles. I generally have a number of
> >> patches for Boost that upstream takes multiple releases to
> >> incorporate.
> >>
> >> If you have a patch for the problem, I encourage you to submit a
> >> Debian bug report as well as the upstream one, and link them.
> >
> > Raising this problem upstream at Ginkgo I was pointed to
> >
> > this bug report against itk upstream
> >
> > https://itk.icts.uiowa.edu/jira/browse/ITK-2457
> >
> > The comment from Mathieu there made me check which gdcm libinsighttolkit
> > depends on in Debian
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/sid/libinsighttoolkit3.20
> >
> > This however indicates that it already depends on gdcm 2.x
> >
> > which in turn means the bug is not fixed ?
> >
> > Supposedly most work is on itk4 which might make the problem go away.
>
> That's correct. ITK in debian has not been using the old GDCM 1.x
> where a static buffer was used to decompress JPEG segment since years.
> ITK uses a thread safe implementation in GDCM 2.x. I would think the
> issue is not the one described in bug ITK-2457
>
> HTH
Now that I think of it upstream release 2.6.0 seems to work better. I will
follow up on this when this is packaged for Debian.
Has the patch mentioned ever made it into ITK ?
Sebastian
Reply to: