[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Ginkgo-CADx segfaults

On Friday, November 11, 2011 01:55:51 AM Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:23:01AM +0100, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:03:09 AM Steffen Möller wrote:
> > > Sorry for saying the obvious here, but if the bug is not
> > > Debian-specific, then it should go to ITK upstream.
> I definitely encourage that patches for upstream bugs be sent
> upstream.
> > The question was more along the lines if Debian packages accept patches
> > which upstream refuses (have not checked with upstream ITK but have had
> > issues with wxwidgets).
> It's common for Debian to have patches not in upstream.  Often, in my
> experience, it's not because of upstream refusal but due to differing
> priority or differing release cycles.  I generally have a number of
> patches for Boost that upstream takes multiple releases to
> incorporate.
> If you have a patch for the problem, I encourage you to submit a
> Debian bug report as well as the upstream one, and link them.

Raising this problem upstream at Ginkgo I was pointed to 

this bug report against itk upstream


The comment from Mathieu there made me check which gdcm libinsighttolkit 
depends on in Debian

This however indicates that it already depends on gdcm 2.x

which in turn means the bug is not fixed ?

Supposedly most work is on itk4 which might make the problem go away.


Reply to: