Re: MediSnap - GPLv3 medical photo system - just released
- To: Jan Kechel <jan@kechel.de>
- Cc: Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: MediSnap - GPLv3 medical photo system - just released
- From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:20:10 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20111015202010.GB24557@an3as.eu>
- In-reply-to: <4E992CA8.604@kechel.de>
- References: <4D39B5A2.3030806@kechel.de> <4D39BC97.5020600@fisglobal.com> <4D39C402.6010203@kechel.de> <20110122142740.GD2404@hermes.hilbert.loc> <4D3AF01F.7060101@kechel.de> <20110122153305.GF2404@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110122195811.GB20958@an3as.eu> <4D3B3C87.2000906@kechel.de> <[🔎] 20111015063359.GC9638@an3as.eu> <4E992CA8.604@kechel.de>
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 07:48:08AM +0100, Jan Kechel wrote:
> On 10/15/2011 07:33 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > the quite interesting discussion about medisnap endet somehow when we
> > realised that the non-free SDK from Olympus is a prerequisite for this
> > software.
>
> Yes .. it's also my fault as I got stuck within millioins of other things ;)
No problem.
> > However, if you ask me any work which was done regarding a
> > Debian package should somehow be kept in our repository for two reasons:
> >
> > 1. It might help users creating their private Debian package
> > 2. It might be that we somehow might get a replacement for the
> > non-free SDK and thus it is good to make some more noise about
> > the package and its importance.
>
> Sure! It's still an interesting project .. and at least the drivers from
> Olympus are freely available. In the meantime maybe somebody else will
> adopt another camera with free drivers (i think nikon has some .. ) I
> also once heard rumors that olympus already _has_ Linux-Drivers, but
> that these are kept secret from other countries .. I don't know :)
Sounds somehow promising.
> > So if you have something done for the packaging, would you mind
> > commiting the according code?
>
> I'm not sure if there is something left I didn't commit.
>
> I guess first I should try a checkout and see what is working an what
> not. The last thing i did was replace the packaged postgresql
> java-driver with a dependency on a deb-package, but that is already
> commited.
I guess this is a misunderstanding. I was talking about the packaging
stuff in the debian/ directory which usually is stored in a SVN or Git
repository on alioth.debian.org. Can you just give me a link to yo
repository with this debian/ directory?
> I'm actually not sure what is missing .. except of lots of improvements
> and stuff to the software itself of course ..
Thanks for the information
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: