Re: ampliconnoise and Doc.pdf
Hi,
I'd not thought about this. The ampliconnoise.1 is generated from the
ampliconnoise.pod which was hand written by me, so that's OK.
The Doc.pdf is presumably made from a Word document that is in the
possession of Chris Quince. I'm sure he'd be prepared to send a copy
and even put it in the upstream tarball, but of course there is no way
to automatically recreate the .pdf from the .docx (or indeed from .odt,
as far as I know). I'm sure this must be discussed somewhere in the
DFSG if I have time to dig through them. In the meantime I'll mail
Chris.
Cheers,
TIM
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 22:51 +0100, Steffen Möller wrote:
> Dear Tim,
>
> it is a nice package from what I saw. Many thanks. I just felt like fiddling here and there a bit when I saw the unfinished
> doc-base and then asked myself how Doc.pdf was actually generated. It would be fine if it is hand-written, say with some PDF
> editor, but if it comes from the POD then we'd need to recreate it rather than accepting the magic as it stands .... or we upload
> to non-free (which I stopped to mind).
>
> Is it hand-written? Or shall we delare it as as such?
>
> Best,
> Steffen
>
--
To Err is human.
To Arrr is Pirate!
Reply to: