On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 03:21:48PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > No, I think the issue is that the patch is patching debian/Makefile.in - > this looks odd. It's just a wrong patch file entry, believe me. > If upstream does not have a Makefile, the patch should create it in the > upstream directory, i.e. below Debian. That is actually the case. > If upstream ships a debian/Makefile.in, what is its use? It does not. :-) Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de