On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 03:21:48PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> No, I think the issue is that the patch is patching debian/Makefile.in -
> this looks odd.
It's just a wrong patch file entry, believe me.
> If upstream does not have a Makefile, the patch should create it in the
> upstream directory, i.e. below Debian.
That is actually the case.
> If upstream ships a debian/Makefile.in, what is its use?
It does not. :-)
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de