Re: hmmer (3.0, sid)
On 08/29/2010 03:55 PM, Eric Talevich wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de>wrote:
>
>> On 08/27/2010 08:12 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Felipe Figueiredo wrote:
>>>>> I just noted that binaries in hmmer 3.0-1 are located in /bin instead
>>>>> of /usr/bin. Is this a bug?
>>> Definitely. I have fixed this in SVN. Eric, I also commited your
>>> upload to SVN (please do so as well in future uploads). You might
>>> either upload the fixed version yourself in case you would like to do
>>> other changes (there is one remaining lintian warning about a formatting
>>> error in a manpage) or just ping me to do the upload.
>> Ups, I should have spotted that in our initial packaging. The
>> sources should have been in the svn repository for long, I possibly
>> just never ran the svn commit on them. So, thanks for fixing all that.
>>
>> Eric, I'll address that all tonight while bringing my laptop back in sync
>> with the repo.
>>
>
> Thanks, Steffen. Sorry for my absence here.
Hi Eric, there is nothing you could have done about it. Andreas has already
fixed it, and I could just recompile and upload.
> Another thought -- HMMer 3 depends on a library and set of binaries called
> Easel the same way HMMer 2 depended on Squid/biosquid. At least one of the
> binaries is generally useful, esl-reformat. Should we extract Easel into a
> separate package at some point?
This sounds very reasonable. However, I must admit that I do have observed
any larger group of followers behind biosquid and don't expect more from Easel,
unless we can persuade upstream to keep the easels from infernal and hmmer
synced and compatible.
Best,
Steffen
Reply to: