Re: Please proofread paper
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:49:03PM -0500, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Attached is a diff with a proposal of changes to this first third of the
> manuscript (need to get some sleep now). If I don't see a flood of
> comments when I wake up, I'll try to get to the end of the manuscript
> and will send more comments -- if I have any.
Thanks again here. I thought I would have answered the remarks in
your mail in my other mail in response to Yaroslav, but I missed one
point.
> In general I had the impression that some aspects are not yet well
> connected with the general flow of the manuscript. Some paragraphs read
> like lists of thoughts that might have to be extended to make them
> easily comprehensible.
I perfectly agree as I said.
> Are there are space constraints?
Not that I'm aware of. If you think we should really put some more
effort into this I might ask the organisers for extending the deadline.
IMHO it is currently somehow "acceptable for the purpose" but thats
normally below the threshold where I say: "I'm happy about this work."
So if you think we have resources (in time and manpower) to spend some
more love on it, I'll contact the organisers. I could commit probably
about 5 hours at the weekend on it.
Thanks again
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: