On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:29:50AM -0400, Paul Novotny wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 20:35 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:43:03PM -0400, Paul Novotny wrote: > > > Adding Review means you can also add WrapITK. Something I think is a > > > good idea, but others may not. > > > > That's an interesting idea: make two API-breaking moves at the same > > time! :-) > > > > On the other hand, ITK v4 is moving to WrapITK for wrapping. So this > > also is a change that will happen eventually. > > > > Will this break anything in Debian? I can't find any reverse-depends > > on the java, python, or tcl bindings. > > I don't know of anything it would break. I thought the WrapITK bindings used different symbol names from the cswig-style wrapping [1], so I'd expect all non-C++ code to break. I'm wondering if there is python or tcl ITK-using code in Debian. [1] http://old.nabble.com/ITK-3.10.1-Packages-for-Ubuntu-8.04-and-8.10-td21568917.html -Steve
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature