On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:43:03PM -0400, Paul Novotny wrote: > On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 23:04 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm considering switching to the new refactored Statistics classes in > > ITK. This is an API-breaking move so I'd like to hear of any concerns > > before implementing this. > > > > The change would be done for version 3.20 of InsightToolkit (currently > > stuck in the NEW queue) and not for version 3.18. So this is not > > targeted for squeeze. > > > > My main motivation for doing this is to enable packaging elastix > > (http://elastix.isi.uu.nl/). Note also that ITK 4.0 will use > > the new statistics so code has to change eventually; this would > > just force the change one version earlier as 3.20 is the last > > release destined for ITK 3.x. > > > > Comments? > > > > -Steve > > Adding Review means you can also add WrapITK. Something I think is a > good idea, but others may not. That's an interesting idea: make two API-breaking moves at the same time! :-) On the other hand, ITK v4 is moving to WrapITK for wrapping. So this also is a change that will happen eventually. Will this break anything in Debian? I can't find any reverse-depends on the java, python, or tcl bindings. Thanks, -Steve
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature