Re: Plans for Squeeze release and Alioth accounts.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:28:20PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> 1) Splitting the med-bio metapackage into med-bio-commandline and
> med-bio-graphical. Not only it makes a clearer organisation, but
> also it can be useful for the creation of small virtual machines
> or live USB keys.
This is probably tho only simple split and considering the fact that we
did not found a better split of this multi-dependency metapackage we
should go for this. Do you think we should leave med-bio and let it
recommend the other two?
> 2) Debtags again. After reviewing all Debtags of my packages last year
> I made some propositions to the Debtags admins to reorganise some
> tags, and most of them were welcome, but we eventually forgot to do
> the work :) I will update my propositions and refresh the Debtags of
> my packages, plus the other packages that are installed by our
> metapackages if I have enough time.
I hope that the Debtags feature of the tasks pages might be helpful
here to attract other people to debtag work as well.
> 3) Meta-data: bibliographic reference, link to main article (DOI? PubMed?),
> and registration pages.
Also mentioned by Steffen - I have seen that you just updated the Wiki
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMedReleaseGoals
I just added two of my points which were missing.
> Other things that I would like to do are finishing the GBrowse package (I may
> have stopped at a stage where 99% is done???) and package more programs relevant
> to ???next-generation??? sequencing. Actually if there are volunteers for preparing
> such packages, I can propose some programs, and I am sure that there will be
> much support on this list for technical questions.
Perhaps you might link to
http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/bio#<pkgname>
to set some priority for people who want to do some work and probably
we should mention this on the Debian Med todo page
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMedTodo
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Klarmachen zum Ändern!
Reply to: