Re: more formally indicating the registration URL
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:12:24PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> /usr/share/icons/Tango/32x32/emotes/face-angel.png
> (also found here in large
> https://sharesource.org/svn/phoneme/theme/png/256x256/face-angel.png)
>
> I found it to fit rather nicely since we are requested to
> to be nice and register
>
> /usr/share/icons/Tango/32x32/devices/stock_mic.png
> (in large http://municipality.zlatograd.com/tango-icons/stock_mic.png)
>
> since we are opening a channel to talk back to upstream, I found
> this mike to be also rather nice.
Well, I admit that I do not really understand at which places you want to
put these icons - I think we wanted to ask a textual information ...
> I would be prepared to follow Michael's suggestion to flag debian/control files with a
> separate URL for the registration and parse that information for the pure-blends' package
> presentation scripts.
... and I replied that these X?-fields will *not* be propagated to a place
where we can parse it for the Blends pages - so sorry, it will not work
this way.
> Is there speaking much against such a pilot? Or should it rather be
> a comment in the description in analogy to the introduction of the " Homepage:" indication?
My suggestion was to use the "Remark" field which ends up in these grayish
additions to a description.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: