On Mon, 4 May 2009, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
How about installing the real binary as /usr/bin/plink.ICR and symlinking to that as /usr/bin/p-link ? That might make things somewhat clearer. (ICR - Institute for Cancer Research, where this plink originates)
Well, I don't think that the *real* name of the binary is the thing which is unclear as long as it is apropriately documented. The divergence was about the name which is accessible via /usr/bin. I think I stick to /usr/lib/plink/plink as the real executable in any case because if you add this dir to your path you are fine with any potentially existing scripts. I don't really mind about the actual name of the link in /usr/bin as long as it is not plink (existing name clash) or snplink (potantial name clash) - but it should be accepted by upstream and propagated to other distributions (Gentoo). Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de