Re: Bug#520747: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#520747: BioCocoa.app and SequenceConverter.app (Was: Bug#520747: Watch file)

[Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>]

On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Yavor Doganov wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:12:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I had the impression that sequenceconverter.app builds and runs
> > fine without biococoa - strange, but worked on my machine.
>
> Right, I wrongly assumed that it links against BioCocoa.

So most probably we might simply release sequenceconverter.app
completely independant from BioCocoa?

> > - I could even give you SVN commit permission (if you tell me your
> > alioth login)
>
> I'm yavor-guest, but maybe it is a good idea to see my patches first :-)

Well, several people read the commit mails and reverting something
should be no problem at all.  So there is no need to hesitate.

> > BTW, when doing the actual packaging I was wondering whether a cdbs
> > module for GNUmake might make sense.
>
> There is: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/gnustep.mk.  I'll convert biococoa to
> use CDBS then, right?

Ahh, that's great - I just not realsied this.  Conversion to CDBS
would be perfectly OK.

> > If you are undergoing some renewal of GNUstep issues this might be an
> > interesting thing to do
>
> Yes, although I'm not a fan of CDBS, personally.

Well, I would not call myself a fan - but it works quite good for
team maintainance because you can have a good overview quite quickly.
But only if it fits - there are more complex packages which just
create headaches if you try to turn them to CDBS.  Just decide
what you would regard reasonable for the specific case - it's fine
if you keep the current packaging.

Kind regards

        Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de