Re: Bug#520747: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#520747: BioCocoa.app and SequenceConverter.app (Was: Bug#520747: Watch file)
- To: Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>
- Cc: 520747@bugs.debian.org, Scott Christley <schristley@mac.com>, Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#520747: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#520747: BioCocoa.app and SequenceConverter.app (Was: Bug#520747: Watch file)
- From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:09:31 +0100 (CET)
- Message-id: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903260849430.5799@wr-linux02>
- In-reply-to: <20090325201338.GA32667@yavor.doganov.org>
- References: <20090322144725.8224.93209.reportbug@localhost> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903230800130.12350@wr-linux02> <6A8137E8-09CB-4356-9E69-66D368E3F6D5@mac.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903250717300.17709@wr-linux02> <20090325144307.GA17684@yavor.doganov.org> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903251604270.5408@wr-linux02> <20090325152956.GB8790@yavor.doganov.org> <20090325201338.GA32667@yavor.doganov.org>
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Here it is. I added some comments in debian/rules for things that
might not be entirely obvious to you -- feel free to strip them.
No, comments are perfectly OK - in contrary, they should be there.
I committed your changes and thank you very much for cleaning things
up.
The only thing I wonder about is the following: Should we file an
ITP for either biococoa (2) or sequenceconverter.app? While
sequenceconverter.app is the real successor of the former biococoa.app
(source and binary package) it might sound like a new for ftpmaster
but in fact biococoa is the new package regarding content and I
also wonder if we even should conserve the old changelog of
biococoa.app - it's just something else.
Any opinions?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: