Hey all, On Wednesday 21 May 2008 15:40, Michael Hanke wrote: > Currently, I'm swamped with PhD work. But I wonder if there really is an > urgent need for quick action. CTN has 2 open bugs -- I've seen worse in > Debian ;-) One bug simply documents the MySQL issue and the other is just > cosmetic. I see no reason why CTN as it is now should not be in lenny > (which it already is, BTW). > > As I said, for my purposes a libctn-dev would be sufficient if the rest > is broken anyway, but I still would like to hear the ctsim maintainer if > that is reasonable for him as well. And as he is also the former CTN > maintainer he should know much better than me. I'd just like to let you know that I'm fine with the proposed solution to trim down ctn to just a lib if possible. As said earlier I think at least some action needs to be taken before lenny. cheers, Thijs
Attachment:
pgpwkvr8PTXWc.pgp
Description: PGP signature