Re: Giving away CTN

[Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>]

On Wed, 21 May 2008, Michael Hanke wrote:

> Quick note: CTN seems to be already part of the debian-med SVN:
>
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-med/trunk/packages/ctn/?rev=0&sc=0

Yes, it is - but it is not really Debian Med policy conformant.  It would
be great to use only debian dir + patches.  On the other hand this package
might make sense to include with full upstream source if upstream is dead.
I'd regard an uploaded package in team maintenance as higher priority for
the moment than polishing it to fit the policy strictly.

Please ask for help if you think you are in trouble meeting the Lenny
freeze right in time.  I think we might have good reasons to convince
release managers to let ctsim, dicomnifti and ctn-dev through - but it
is better to meet the deadline.

To be honest ctn and ctsim are some remaining weakly maintained packages
listed at

   http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/imaging.php

and I'm really interested to get them in good shape soon.

Kind regards

        Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de