Re: RFS: adun.app (updated package)

[Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>]

В вт, 2008-01-22 в 14:50 +0100, Andreas Tille написа:
> when you add gnustep-make as build dependency adun.app package builds
> nicely with pbuilder.

It should build fine without build-depending on gnustep-make explicitly,
since it is pulled in by the dependency chain.  At least it does for me,
as well as many other GNUstep packages.  What errors do you get?

> $ UL
> 2008-01-22 14:48:17.260 UL[30685] Detected error from domain ULFramework.ErrorDomain
> 2008-01-22 14:48:17.262 UL[30685] Error code 0
> 2008-01-22 14:48:17.264 UL[30685] Description - Database Error
> 2008-01-22 14:48:17.265 UL[30685] Detail - Could not connect to the specified database
> 2008-01-22 14:48:17.266 UL[30685] Recovery suggestion - Check a database exists at /home/tillea/adun/Database
> Segmentation fault

This is the first time I see this, very strange.  Here is what I get
when I remove ~/adun/ and everything related from
~/GNUstep/Defaults/.GNUstepDefaults:

2008-01-22 16:19:54.304 UL[14747] Database directory /home/yavor/adun/Database/Systems was missing.
2008-01-22 16:19:54.305 UL[14747] Created it and the corresponding index
2008-01-22 16:19:54.338 UL[14747] Database directory /home/yavor/adun/Database/Options was missing.
2008-01-22 16:19:54.339 UL[14747] Created it and the corresponding index
2008-01-22 16:19:54.371 UL[14747] Database directory /home/yavor/adun/Database/DataSets was missing.
2008-01-22 16:19:54.372 UL[14747] Created it and the corresponding index
2008-01-22 16:19:54.404 UL[14747] Database directory /home/yavor/adun/Database/Simulations was missing.
2008-01-22 16:19:54.405 UL[14747] Created it and the corresponding index
2008-01-22 16:19:54.415 UL[14747] AdunSQLDatabase bundle not available.
2008-01-22 16:19:54.416 UL[14747] SQL backend support disabled

Then the app starts fine.  Do these directories exist in your
$HOME/adun/Database?  The code that creates them and rebuilds the
indices is at UL/ULFramework/ULFileSystemDatabaseBackend.m.  I see
nothing suspicious at first glance.

Can anyone else reproduce this?  (I'll try on a different machine
tonight.)

> I have no experience with GNUstep and I'm running this under xfce.

This shouldn't be a problem.

> BTW, I added a watch file but version 0.74 is considered newer than
> 0.8.2.

TTBOMK there is no solution to this.  But I might be wrong, I've never
played seriously with watch files.

(I'm not subscribed to debian-med, so please CC me.  Thanks.)