Re: MglTools in meta package dependencies

[Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de>]

Hi Andreas,

Andreas Tille schrieb:
> I'm a little bit unsure how to put mgltools packages into the
> metapackage dependencies.  I'm completely uneducated about
> mgltools and just tried to guess the following dependencies:
mgltools (of mgltoos.scripps.edu) is a tool per se and should alone
appear as a package. The remainder are helping packages.

The mgltools should be substituted with the package autodocktools, which
is due to appear in unstable any moment, really. It is in new, still. I
was tempted to name it mgltools-autodocktools but then decided against
it. That package has dependencies to most of the mgltools- bits. Another
package to appear as important in its own right is mgltools-vision. This
comes with mostly the same mgltools- packages and some more, of which
two were rejected (rightously) for license issues. But upstream promised
to address this.

Summary: list autodocktools and mgltools-vision

Best,

Steffen