[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Better l10n for CDDs



On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, David Paleino wrote:

It seems like you're not reading my posts :p

Sure I'm reading your mails, but there is some delay in e-mails, you know. ;-))

Check those pages again... ;)

Did so, works now!

That might be another solution -- less efficient IMHO, but there are always
different POVs.

Why do you think a static HTML is less efficient than a dynamically created
PHP page???

Really? I can't believe that!

You want to see a video????

PHP's gettext() is not that bad... probably you have some other problem with
your filter?

I agree I have several problems with the filter.  The most burning is that
I have no influence at all on this - I just have to accept what is installed
by others ...

Do you have any log for that? I can put some lines of code to see
how much it takes to PHP to generate the "final" page... but that would be
milliseconds, IMHO.

I really don't know what happens (and I have nearly no chance to debug).
The filter does "something" because it regards the page as active and on
any page load of such a tasks page and also the main page

   http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/

I see a progress bar (this time for 9 seconds!!!) and the response is
a local copy of my filter

   http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/GGTSPU-vaccine-nu.rki.de-5803-22282-DAT/

This is not the case for http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/ but every
single tasks page also shows this *really* annoying behaviour.  So my guess
is that there is some content in the pages that is regarded as active and
potentially harmfull.  I have no idea what this actually is but plain HTML
would definitely not trigger this stupid nuisance.  Because I personally
see no drawback at all to build plain fully translated HTML pages I decided
to try this approach instead of PHP.  This as the extra advantage of easier
inspection the results on your local system whithout running PHP.

Kind regards

        Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: