On Thu, 22 May 2008 22:44:39 +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > > GNUmed is rather complex > > It is not any more complex than it needs to be. Oh well, it is "complex" to me. I'm not a *real* Python coder, I can just put together some lines... > Yes, it solves quite a few infrastructure coding problems all of which, > however, will need to be solved by your eventual software, too (localization, > translation, modules, logging, error handling, database access, what-not). That's rather easy in a language you know (-- I don't really know Python, I go by trial-and-error ;) ) > In fact, GNUmed is a lot less complex semantically than what it needs to > become - it doesn't cover any billing or prescribing so far. True, and I'd need that as well. > > and is meant for general-purpose medicine. > > This is true. However, any doctor needs patient management. Sure :) > > Dentists need a more specific software (i.e. usually they also have a > > printout of teeth to click on and select treatment). > > That would be fairly easy to add. Again, for any *python coder* ;) I feel far more comfortable with C#, which OpenDental is written in. Anyway, I'll look at GNUmed again, I promise :) Thanks for your reply, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature