On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 07:40:34PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > I just read one of the messages of Pierre Habouzit, in which he says > that for the glibc packages the forward status is also encoded in the > patch name. That doesn't seem wise to me. Whether it is forwarded or not is a status, which changes over time. I'm not about to rename a patch simply because I've forwarded it upstream. I may edit the preamble. My 2 cents, -Steve
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature