[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GDCM2 : An Open Source DICOM library



Hi Andreas,

On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
>  > A long time ago I requested someone to take over packaging for GDCM.
>
>  Well, unfortunately our man power is limited even if we are perfectly
>  willing to support you.  Sometimes we also just forget something.  At
>  last this should not happen from now on any more because we now
>  maintain a list of prospective packages at
>
>    http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/imaging.php

Could someone correct: s/gdmc/gdcm/g on the page, thanks.

>  (Hmmm, in principle gdcm should be listed _now_ because I just
>  added it to the propestive packages and regenerated the page, but
>  obviousely we need another round of debugging ...)
>
>
>  > 3 years later the project has grown up and is now in its second
>  > generation, we moved the development over to sf.net. The source code
>  > is distributed under a new style BSD license. And package for debian
>  > are available under the file section:
>  >
>  > svn:
>  > http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gdcm/trunk/
>  >
>  > debian package
>  > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=137895&package_id=197047
>
>  This is really great and enhances the chances for inclusion into
>  Debian drastically.
>
>
>  > What do I need else to make it officially a debian package ?
>
>  I really hope that somebody would find some time to verify your package
>  and then we can sponsor it to official Debian.  My personal schedule will
>  not allow this for the next two weeks.  But please don't be shy and ask
>  in about three weeks again if nobody volunteered to have a look until
>  than.
>
>  > Thanks for your consideration,
>
>  Thank you for your very interesting input and sorry if we seemed to
>  have forgot you after your first mail.
>
>  Kind regards
>
>              Andreas.
>  --
>  http://fam-tille.de
>


Thanks,
-- 
Mathieu


Reply to: