Re: New pacakge containing binaries with same name as some from the packages cons, pscan and hsffig.

To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: New pacakge containing binaries with same name as some from the packages cons, pscan and hsffig.
From: ucko@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko)
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 20:30:11 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] udl3b2gxe24.fsf@vinegar-pot.mit.edu>
Mail-followup-to: debian-med@lists.debian.org
References: <20070428095345.GA9041@kunpuu.plessy.org> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0704281529180.8920@wr-linux02>

Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de> writes:

>    1. Ask upstream to use em_* names - or rename all binaries according
>       to this (probably not reasonable because users own scripts will
>       fail.
>    2. Use the wrapper method like PhyLip packae does.

I would endorse any combination of these first two.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger amu@monk.mit.edu (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New pacakge containing binaries with same name as some from the packages cons, pscan and hsffig.
  - From: Charles Plessy <charles-debian-nospam@plessy.org>

Next by Date: Re: New pacakge containing binaries with same name as some from the packages cons, pscan and hsffig.
Next by thread: Re: New pacakge containing binaries with same name as some from the packages cons, pscan and hsffig.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread