Il giorno Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:41:19 +0200 (CEST) Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de> ha scritto: > I really like both (with the minor nitpicking that line spacings on the > overview page could be a little bit more dense). I know, I'll work on this. > > I think I could add more fields to the single-package-pages, please let me > > know what you wish to be added! > > At the moment I have no suggestions for the single package pages but I > would like to see the bug severity listed on the overview page (perhaps > even using some kind of color code (red for RC, yellow for normal, green > for wishlist - or something like that, I'm just spoiling rugh ideas). I'll work on that too. > I'm working on this now I obviousely do not have to care about the python-apt > stuff. There is one thing I'm wondering about: How did you choose the > packages on the bug page? Those are the packages where the maintainer is debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint=debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org I believe we'll should switch all the packages to follow this criteria (as many other teams do -- see Debian-Xfce and Debian-Perl) > I would love if this list would be read from the > meta package dependency list. This would easily enable us to build those > pages for all existing meta packages. They will be automatically generated, as long as there are bugs filed against those meta-packages. Otherwise, I'll have to change the approach. > Kind regards > Andreas. Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://snipurl.com/qa_page/ : :' : Linuxer #334216 | http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://www.debianizzati.org/ `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature